|
PAST LETTERS FROM THE PRESIDENT |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interim
Results Of Possum And The Surgical Risk Score To Show The Affects Of Timing
Of Hip Fracture Surgery On Outcomes. Can We Do Better?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
K Narayanasetty*, M Mueller**, J Fonseca**, RS Ahluwalia*** *Southampton University Hospitals, NHS Trust, **Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, ***Colchester General Hospital, Essex Rivers NHS Trust Introduction: We present the use of Orthopaedic POSSUM Score and Surgical Risk Score (SRS) in fracture neck of femur surgery. The objective of this study was to identify the physiological status at admission and at operation and differences in predictive and actual patient operative outcomes. Material and Methods: All 338 consecutive, hip fractures from December to July 2005 at three hospitals were assessed prospectively. Collection of demographic, admission and operative POSSUM, and SRS scores, fracture pathology, physiological status, and outcomes were conducted. Results: In total, 306 (90.5%) patients had surgery. The median age was 73 (range 55-95). The majority had co-morbidities (77.5%; n=237), as suggested by average ASA scores of 3.2. POSSUM predicted mortality was 13.6% (n=25) at 30 days, where as the SRS predicted 11.4% (n=21), but mortality was 7.1% (n=13) if operated before 48hours. Differences between admission and operative physiological Possum score increased with operative delay (table 1). Physiological scores over 30 had a 67.8% risk of 30-day mortality, 86 patients had an increase in physiological score from admission to operation, resulting in higher analgesic requirements and reduced mobility scores (P<0.005). Conclusion: Possum and SRS over predict operative mortality, but comparison of admission and operative physiological POSSUM scores indicate room for improvement in preoperative care, if surgery is delayed.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||